Max Gibson of Batman Beyond: Con
I guess it's no secret. I don't like Max. I was the first
poster at
this site to say so and I've had to defend it ever since.
Lately I
don't feel so alone. Max has become the most divisive
character in
the Bat universe since the vote on Jason Todd. In a
sense our fans
are voting on her now. One third of them love Max. One
third loathe
her. And one third want to root for her but would change
her if they
could. I see problems with that wish. The character likes
herself
just the way she is, therefore she has no reason to
change. Besides,
we've spent two seasons developing Max without success.
Must we spend
more Batman time on her? Many fans say no. So, why not?
Well, for starters some fans don't like Max because she
has foot-in-
mouth disease. I agree. She makes fun of people then
gets offended
that they're offended. Her angle tends toward "what's in
it for me?"
and that gets old fast. I'll admit most sidekicks are
wise-mouths.
But that's the point : Terry is the resident mouth. The
show can't
support any more, certainly not an unpopular one. (I
believe the
phrase was "ineffably annoying.") What concerns me more
is how often
Max has lied to Terry -- and that he never lied to Bruce
Wayne until
he fell under her influence ("Once burned").
Other fans claim Max is just a cliche and a marketing
gimmick. Max
was allegedly created to lure a hip younger audience that
wouldn't
normally watch a Batman show. The suits can call it
making Bats more
accessible. Longtime fans call it trendy and the results
fluff. Terry
was created to be Wayne's successor, extraordinary. A
troubled loner
who tolerated Dana's attempts to change him. He tolerated
Dana's
friends. He didn't wallow in "ordinary" teenage problems
; basically
Max has BECOME his teenage problem. The truth is Max
holds Terry
back. She keeps him tied to her teen scene when he should
be playing
chess with Arkham inmates or learning to run Wayne's
company. It
dates the show. If the fans can outgrow Batman, a
cultural icon, then
the show's getting something wrong.
Secondly, Max is a loose-cannon version of the
damsel-in-distress.
Max never could consider the consequences of her actions.
That,
combined with her nosiness, ego, and inability to take No
for an
answer makes her a magnet for trouble. She doesn't
respect Terry --
not really -- which is why she always has a "better
idea." She also
botches Terry's attempts to clean up after her, as a
Damsel should.
This was supposed to make the man look more heroic by
giving him more
obstacles to overcome. On this show the cliche
backfires. Batman
can't afford the distraction. Twice people have been
injured or
killed because Terry left them to fetch Max ("Final cut,"
"COTK part
2"). That's not heroic. In fact it makes Terry look weak
because he
can't rein her in.
Third, Max is a writer's crutch so common that in Star
Trek fanfic it
has its own name : the Mary Sue gimmick. Typically "Mary
Sue" is a
brilliant young persom who's shoehorned into someone
else's
adventures. But there's no work for her. The characters
already have
all the traits the story needs. So the writer revises
(i.e. dumbs
down) the existing characters so that Mary Sue can dazzle
them. Some
examples? One : Terry, the street-smart ex-con, can set
his own traps
("Shriek," "Ace in the hole"). In "April moon" he doesn't
know how.
Max does it for him. Two : Terry was the one who taught
Max how to
palm cash cards, not the other way around ("Hooked up").
Terry used
to be good at math ("Earth mover"). He stated that his
scientist
father drilled him in math to give him an edge in life.
We know
Terry's good with computers ("Out of the past," many
more). He claims
he can manage Wayne's business affairs at any time if
Wayne is
unavailable ("Shriek"). All these things Terry can do.
Yet in "Final
cut" Terry can't tie his shoelaces. He is holding a
remote control
that "his" company sells. But suddenly Terry doesn't know
how to look
up and read the owner's manual. He also can't solve a
middle-school
geometry problem. Additionally, Bruce is incommunicado
-- that's out
of character for a tech wizard and a control freak. But
Terry
shouldn't have needed anyone at all! The original Terry
is not this
helpless. He was dumbed down so that Max could dazzle
him.
Having "Batman learn from a student just makes him look
stupid. It
also implies Wayne hasn't taught him a thing.
Many more fans dislike Max because she siphons screen
time from other
characters. Agreed. We were sold the Wayne-and-Terry
show. Instead
the writers gave Max most of Wayne's duties : to sleuth,
to scold, to
advise. Whatever happened to Terry being apprenticed to
the most
dangerous man on earth? The fans feel lied to, and maybe
they were.
Dana, Mary and Matt were also sacrificed so that Max
could become all
things and all people to Terry. It's ironic that Matt
saved her life
("Hidden agenda"). Matt never needed to know the truth to
be an
effective foil. He's also a huge Batfan. That would have
made things
far more intense whenever Terry and Matt crossed each
other. If Matt
felt Batman should stay home in "Babel," it would break
Terry's
heart. If Matt had starred in "Hooked up," he'd have been
forced to
choose between his hero and the father he'd do anything
to see again
("Revenant"). The episode could have concluded with Terry
facing
his "father" as well. Would Warren have given his
blessing? Terry
will wrestle with that question all his life. This
would've been a
good time to start. We also missed our one best chance
to develop
Spellbinder's character. He has detailed files on Terry's
family. He
would have played Matt like a violin. So Max isn't just
taking screen
time from the good guys but from the villains too.
Dana had several sudden insights into Terry's behavior
("Big time,"
Inqueling") but lost the actual scenes to Max. It's rare
that Dana's
allowed to do something other than nag. To chase after
HER boyfriend,
to listen when he's unhappy, or to give him a
long-overdue apology in
person instead of through the grapevine. To be there for
him. Well,
she had two chances (eps) in a row and somehow Max aced
her out of
both of them. Dana is simply too territorial to allow
this Max-makes-
threesome development. In her way Dana is as tough a
fighter as
Terry. She takes no guff from anyone, stands up to
everyone. It
took her three seasons just to stomach Wayne. No, if Dana
could be
jealous of a hospital patient ("Untouchable"), she'd
never let Max
spend more time with her guy than she does. Besides Max
isn't a
marriage counselor. She could very well make things
worse by keeping
a couple together who don't speak to each other. They
need to face
their problems themselves. As for Mary, even when her son
vanished
("Where's Terry"), she did nothing. Just once, and this
time
especially, she should've grilled Wayne about why he
needs Terry at 3
A.M. anyhow. (Wayne could be running drugs for all she
knows.) This
favoritism to Max makes no sense. The point of a
supporting character
is to support the stars and their story. Developing Dana,
Mary and
Matt develops Terry. Developing Max develops Max. Now
barring
mischief, Terry is stuck with his family (maybe Dana) for
life and
they with him. They're the ones who had to visit him in
jail. Not
Max. Terry broke their hearts yesterday, he's a menace to
them today
("Bloodsport," "ROTJ"), he will hurt them again tomorrow.
Their
voices deserve to be heard.
Many fans go further, stating that if Dana, Mary or Matt
can't be
Terry's confidante then he shouldn't have one at all. Let
him talk to
Bruce or work it out alone. These are fans who found the
"Alfred"
joke insulting. Alfred worked his whole life to become
the man Bruce
trusted and loved. He didn't come out of a box like that.
Alfred was
a father figure who raised Bruce. Now we have Terry who
has taken
Wayne and put him in place of his own dead father. This
needs to be
explored. Instead what the Max Gibson Show does is
explore ways to
keep Terry an amateur.
Still other fans say the Max character is unbelievable,
too good with
computers for a high school student. Hmm. I'll agree,
with
conditions. A 12th-grader browsing the Defense
Department's system
and never getting caught ("Once burned") is unrealistic
even for a
hacker. Unfortunately there really are hackers out there
who'd do it
if they knew how. If Batman existed that's exactly the
type of person
who'd try to expose him. To me what's even more
make-believe is that
Terry would need or want a friend like that. Batman's
life is not her
toy. What sort of "friend" does this :
"Someone tries to identify Batman. Someone stalks him
electronically.
Terry is found out and visits Someone to throw himself on
the mercy
of the court. Someone replies, I have what I wanted. But
talk to me.
Confide in me. Then I'll decide if that's more valuable
than exposing
you. I'll be your evil Lois Lane. I'll tag along on your
patrols and
get the exclusive. Even if you say no to this deal I'll
do what I
want. I own you now." Now whom did I just describe? Max
in "Hidden
agenda" or Ian the "Sneak Peek"?
It's both of them. Max is, at heart, the child that Ian
Peek and
thrill-seeker Roxy Rockett never had. That's why she
created her list
in the first place. Max spent days targeting people to
prey upon. She
believed her quarry had connections to Hill High. That
means she
hacked the personnel records and the school counselor's
files to find
him. So the odds are that every person on her list had a
secret. All
she had to do was put pressure on them, one after
another, and see
what they confessed to.
Max set out to identify Batman for no reason, just for
fun. But I ask
you, if Max could identify an undercover cop working
narcotics or in
the mob, should she do that for fun?
I realize some fans feel they have to tolerate these
problems because
they're hungry for a Batgirl Beyond, and they think it's
Max or
nothing. Again, more fans say No than Yes. Let's keep in
mind that
fans liked Barbara Gordon long before she donned a mask.
If she
hadn't already been well-loved, giving her new clothes
wouldn't have
made her so. Now I only recently became a Batgirl/Oracle
fan. The
things I like about her had to be convincing. It had to
make sense to
me. And I don't think Max Gibson is an honorable
successor.
Consider that Barbara Gordon could have exposed Batman
and Robin at
any time. Batman was a permanent fixture in her father's
office. She
went to school with Robin. Went on patrol with him, went
on dates.
Barbara's also a computer expert who started with talent
but trained
professionally. She certainly could have identified
Batman faster
than Max did. So why not do it? Did she agree with
Two-Face? He
thought Batman WAS a cop, or at least was on Jim Gordon's
payroll
("Almost got 'im"). Or maybe she said, I won't. It's
wrong.
Writer Greg Rucka ("No man's land") has another
explanation. He puts
words in Oracle's mouth that the mask is a sacred trust.
It doesn't
just protect the wearer. It protects the innocent. People
can die if
they know too much. They can die if the masked one acts
unworthily.
Barbara knew that being a vigilante means having so much
power you
have to police yourself because no one else can do it.
This is a
lesson Max has singularly failed to learn.
In fact Max hasn't a clue why people even wear the mask.
Max wants to
be a hero. Batman doesn't get to be a hero.
To be Batman is to be driven. Obsessed. Maybe even
possessed. Did
Bruce Wayne ever really enjoy what he was doing? Or did
he get so
bone-weary that every fiber in his being wanted to stop
-- but he
couldn't? Terry shows hints of this behavior himself. He
has a
serious guilt/inferiority complex and it seems to be
getting worse
with time, not better. One fan commented that this is why
Bruce Wayne
and Terry make such a good team. They're the only ones
who can help
each other heal. The Wayne-and-Terry show was a real
treat and
deserves to return in all future Batman Beyond versions,
live and
animated.
To sum up, it's not just that I don't like Max. I don't
like what her
presence has done to the show and its characters. I don't
like the
way she treats people. Max was irresponsible,
self-serving, often
unethical and even unteachable. She dug such a deep hole
for herself
that when she finally did something good (moralizing in
"Zeta" and
the Big Time episodes), it sounded bizarre, phony. Out of
character.
I mentioned there were on-the-fence fans. Several have
since dropped
out. I'm not sure but they may have donor fatigue. Max
has been given
so many last chances that people are just tired of it.
Max is intelligent. She can be brave, relentless, and
she's strong.
Now strength is a necessary quality in a leader. But I
won't follow a
man just because he's strong.
I don't trust Max. I think Terry can't either.
I see Max Gibson as an experiment that didn't work. Let
her bow out
gracefully, not to be seen again. You may think that's
harsh but I'm
going easy on her compared to what the
death-and-dismemberment
faction wanted to do. I guess the kindest way to put it
is that this
isn't her calling. If Max wants to be a hero she should
join the fire
department. But she doesn't have enough popular support
to justify
keeping her in "Batman Beyond."
By "The Old Maid"
|